Advertisement
Original article| Volume 66, ISSUE 4, P353-358, October 2015

Plaque REgression with Cholesterol absorption Inhibitor or Synthesis inhibitor Evaluated by IntraVascular UltraSound (PRECISE-IVUS Trial): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Open ArchivePublished:January 07, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.12.011

      Abstract

      Background

      Although the positive association between achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level and the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) has been confirmed by randomized studies with statins, many patients remain at high residual risk of events suggesting the necessity of novel pharmacologic strategies. The combination of ezetimibe/statin produces greater reductions in LDL-C compared to statin monotherapy.

      Purpose

      The Plaque REgression with Cholesterol absorption Inhibitor or Synthesis inhibitor Evaluated by IntraVascular UltraSound (PRECISE-IVUS) trial was aimed at evaluating the effects of ezetimibe addition to atorvastatin, compared with atorvastatin monotherapy, on coronary plaque regression and change in lipid profile in patients with CAD.

      Methods

      The study is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study. The eligible patients undergoing IVUS-guided percutaneous coronary intervention will be randomly assigned to receive either atorvastatin alone or atorvastatin plus ezetimibe (10 mg) daily using a web-based randomization software. The dosage of atorvastatin will be increased by titration within the usual dose range with a treatment goal of lowering LDL-C below 70 mg/dL based on consecutive measures of LDL-C at follow-up visits. IVUS will be performed at baseline and 9–12 months follow-up time point at participating cardiovascular centers. The primary endpoint will be the nominal change in percent coronary atheroma volume measured by volumetric IVUS analysis.

      Conclusion

      PRECISE-IVUS will assess whether the efficacy of combination of ezetimibe/atorvastatin is noninferior to atorvastatin monotherapy for coronary plaque reduction, and will translate into increased clinical benefit of dual lipid-lowering strategy in a Japanese population.

      Keywords

      Introduction

      Cardiovascular (CV) disease remains the leading cause of death and a major cause of disability affecting quality of life [
      • Lozano R.
      • Naghavi M.
      • Foreman K.
      • Lim S.
      • Shibuya K.
      • Aboyans V.
      • Abraham J.
      • Adair T.
      • Aggarwal R.
      • Ahn S.Y.
      • Alvarado M.
      • Anderson H.R.
      • Anderson L.M.
      • Andrews K.G.
      • Atkinson C.
      • et al.
      Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.
      ]. Increased levels of blood cholesterol are causally related to an increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). Consistent with global studies, the age- and gender-adjusted incidences of CHD have been shown to significantly increase with increasing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels [
      • Imamura T.
      • Doi Y.
      • Arima H.
      • Yonemoto K.
      • Hata J.
      • Kubo M.
      • Tanizaki Y.
      • Ibayashi S.
      • Iida M.
      • Kiyohara Y.
      LDL cholesterol and the development of stroke subtypes and coronary heart disease in a general Japanese population: the Hisayama study.
      ]. Also, the positive association between achieved LDL-C level and the risk of CHD has been confirmed by randomized trials of lipid lowering [
      • Baigent C.
      • Keech A.
      • Kearney P.M.
      • Blackwell L.
      • Buck G.
      • Pollicino C.
      • Kirby A.
      • Sourjina T.
      • Peto R.
      • Collins R.
      • Simes R.
      Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators
      Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins.
      ]. In recognition of the benefits of intensive lipid-lowering therapy, the US National Cholesterol Education Program published an update document, suggesting a lower optional therapeutic goal for LDL-C in high-risk patients [
      • Grundy S.M.
      • Cleeman J.I.
      • Merz C.N.
      • Brewer Jr., H.B.
      • Clark L.T.
      • Hunninghake D.B.
      • Pasternak R.C.
      • Smith Jr., S.C.
      • Stone N.J.
      National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association. Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines.
      ].
      However, despite current standards of care aimed at achieving targets for LDL-C with the use of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins), many patients continue to experience CV events and remain exposed to a high “residual risk” of future acute coronary events. Therefore, additional novel pharmacologic strategies for the prevention of CHD remain essential, particularly for high-risk patients [e.g. diabetic, or with acute coronary syndrome (ACS)].
      On the other hand, ezetimibe inhibits the absorption of biliary and dietary cholesterol from the small intestine by blocking the Niemann-Pick C1 Like 1 receptor. Its addition to statin therapy leads to further decreases in LDL-C levels by 12–14%, allowing a greater proportion of patients to reach their National Cholesterol Education Program goal [
      • Pearson T.A.
      • Denke M.A.
      • McBride P.E.
      • Battisti W.P.
      • Brady W.E.
      • Palmisano J.
      A community-based, randomized trial of ezetimibe added to statin therapy to attain NCEP ATP III goals for LDL cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic patients: the ezetimibe add-on to statin for effectiveness (EASE) trial.
      ,
      • Bays H.E.
      • Ose L.
      • Fraser N.
      • Tribble D.L.
      • Quinto K.
      • Reyes R.
      • Johnson-Levonas A.O.
      • Sapre A.
      • Donahue S.R.
      Ezetimibe Study Group
      A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, factorial design study to evaluate the lipid-altering efficacy and safety profile of the ezetimibe/simvastatin tablet compared with ezetimibe and simvastatin monotherapy in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.
      ,
      • Ballantyne C.M.
      • Abate N.
      • Yuan Z.
      • King T.R.
      • Palmisano J.
      Dose-comparison study of the combination of ezetimibe and simvastatin (Vytorin) versus atorvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia: the Vytorin Versus Atorvastatin (VYVA) study.
      ]. IMPROVE-IT will determine whether the addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy, using ezetimibe/simvastatin, improves CV outcomes compared with simvastatin monotherapy in patients after ACS [
      • Cannon C.P.
      • Giugliano R.P.
      • Blazing M.A.
      • Harrington R.A.
      • Peterson J.L.
      • Sisk C.M.
      • Strony J.
      • Musliner T.A.
      • McCabe C.H.
      • Veltri E.
      • Braunwald E.
      • Califf R.M.
      IMPROVE-IT Investigators Rationale and design of IMPROVE-IT (IMProved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial): comparison of ezetimbe/simvastatin versus simvastatin monotherapy on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes.
      ]. However, whether the additional LDL-C lowering achieved with the addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy will lead to stronger coronary plaque regression is currently unknown [
      • Hiro T.
      • Hirayama A.
      • Ueda Y.
      • Komatsu S.
      • Matsuoka H.
      • Takayama T.
      • Ishihara M.
      • Hayashi T.
      • Saito S.
      • Kodama K.
      ZIPANGU Investigators
      Rationale and design of a randomized clinical study to investigate the effect of ezetimibe, a cholesterol absorption inhibitor, on the regression of intracoronary plaque evaluated by non-obstructive angioscopy and ultrasound: The ZIPANGU study.
      ]. Also, whether the difference of lipid-lowering strategy (sole inhibition of cholesterol synthesis vs. combined inhibition of synthesis and absorption) would have an impact on the plaque progression/regression has been not well understood. Thus, the Plaque REgression with Cholesterol absorption Inhibitor or Synthesis inhibitor Evaluated by IntraVascular UltraSound (PRECISE-IVUS) trial was designed to evaluate the effects of ezetimibe (cholesterol absorption inhibitor) addition to atorvastatin (cholesterol synthesis inhibitor), compared with atorvastatin monotherapy, on coronary plaque regression and change in lipid profile in patients with CHD. The study will also assess whether the efficacy of combination of ezetimibe/atorvastatin is noninferior to atorvastatin monotherapy for plaque reduction.

      Study design

      Study protocol

      PRECISE-IVUS will be a prospective, randomized, controlled, assessor-blind, multicenter study to evaluate the effect of ezetimibe addition to atorvastatin on coronary artery atheroma volume as measured by IVUS in patients with CHD. Patients who satisfy all criteria for inclusion will be enrolled after having undergone successful coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) under IVUS guidance to treat an episode of ACS or stable CHD (Table 1). Exclusion criteria are listed in Table 2. According to the criteria, the eligible patients will give written informed consent and then be randomly assigned to receive either atorvastatin alone or atorvastatin plus ezetimibe (10 mg) daily using a web-based randomization software conducted at the Large-Scale Clinical Trial Promotion Unit of the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University (Fig. 1). Minimization, a dynamic randomization method that can balance groups with respect to both the numbers in each treatment arm and the characteristics of each group, will be utilized in the PRECISE-IVUS trial [
      • Pocock S.J.
      • Simon R.
      Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial.
      ]. The randomization will be stratified by 1) gender, 2) age, 3) history of hypertension, 4) history of diabetes, 5) history of peripheral arterial disease, 6) serum LDL-C level, 7) serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level, 8) serum triglyceride (TG) level, and 9) statin pretreatment prior to study enrollment. The dosage of atorvastatin will be increased by titration within the usual dose range with a treatment goal of lowering LDL-C below 70 mg/dL based on Western lipoprotein management guidelines [
      • Brunzell J.D.
      • Davidson M.
      • Furberg C.D.
      • Goldberg R.B.
      • Howard B.V.
      • Stein J.H.
      • Witztum J.L.
      Lipoprotein management in patients with cardiometabolic risk: consensus conference report from the American Diabetes Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
      ]. If LDL-C levels are still 70 mg/dL or above, the atorvastatin dosage may be increased up to a maximum dose. If the investigator finds it necessary to reduce the dosage because of an excessive decrease in LDL-C or occurrence of adverse events, the dosage may be reduced again to a minimum dose at the discretion of the participating physician. The participants will continue taking the allocated drugs until the end of study. Investigators will follow up the participants for 9–12 months at participating centers or general physician's clinics, and will conduct medical examinations and blood testing. IVUS and CAG will be performed at baseline and 9–12 months follow-up time point at participating cardiovascular centers. This study is approved by the Institutional Review Board or Independent Ethics Committee of all of the participating centers. The planned duration is between October 2010 and September 2014 and the enrollment period may be extended if necessary. This study has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01043380), according to the statement of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
      Table 1Inclusion criteria.
      1. Patients who agree to be enrolled in the trial giving signed written informed consent
      2. Aged 30–85 years at the time of their consent
      3. Patients who have been diagnosed as ACS or stable coronary heart disease
      4. Patients who undergo CAG or PCI under IVUS guidance
      5. Patients with LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL at the time of their consent
      ACS, acute coronary syndrome; CAG, coronary angiography; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; IVUS, intravascular ultrasound; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
      Table 2Exclusion criteria.
      1. Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia
      2. Patients treated with ezetimibe
      3. Patients treated with fibrates
      4. Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine ≥2.0 mg/dL)
      5. Altered hepatic function (serum AST or ALT ≥ 3-folds of standard value in each institute)
      6. Patients undergoing hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis
      7. Any allergy to atorvastatin or ezetimibe
      8. Severe underlying disease
      9. Lack of decision-making capacity
      10. Patients recognized as inadequate by attending physician
      AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase.
      Figure thumbnail gr1
      Fig. 1Flow chart of the study timeline. Patients will be allocated to either atorvastatin monotherapy or atorvastatin/ezetimibe combination therapy. The target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level will be <70 mg/dL, in which atorvastatin is titrated by increasing the dosage up to a maximum dose daily. At the baseline and 9–12 month follow-up period, coronary angioscopy and intravascular ultrasound are performed. ACS, acute coronary syndrome; SAP, stable angina pectoris; CAG, coronary angiography; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; IVUS, intravascular ultrasound.

      IVUS acquisition and analysis

      The PRECISE-IVUS trial uses IVUS to trace lumen and vessel border, and to calculate coronary atheroma parameters at baseline and after trial treatment. Investigators will be required to use the same IVUS imaging system [40–45 MHz mechanical rotational commercially available IVUS imaging catheter (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA; Terumo Corp., Tokyo, Japan; Volcano Corp., Rancho Cordova, CA, USA) and console] for both the baseline and follow-up IVUS image acquisition. Before imaging, intracoronary nitroglycerin 0.1 to 0.2 mg was administered. The IVUS catheter was advanced into the PCI or non-PCI vessel as distally as possible and withdrawn at a pullback speed of 0.5 mm/s automatically. IVUS images will be recorded onto CD-R for later offline analysis. The images will be logged and qualitative IVUS analysis will be performed by 2 independent blinded experienced observers in the IVUS core lab at the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University according to the Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Regression/Progression Studies [
      • Mintz G.S.
      • Garcia-Garcia H.M.
      • Nicholls S.J.
      • Weissman N.J.
      • Bruining N.
      • Crowe T.
      • Tardif J.C.
      • Serruys P.W.
      Clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound regression/progression studies.
      ]. IVUS exclusion criteria might include 1) calcified plaque, 2) any cross-sections with a recognizable non-uniform rotation distortion (NURD), 3) presence of external elastic membrane out of view, 4) loss of image due to bubbles, or 5) any other artifact that prevents complete analysis. Coronary atheroma parameters will be assessed by volumetric analysis with the echoPlaque3 system (INDEC Systems, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA). Baseline and follow-up IVUS images will be reviewed side-by-side on a display, and the target segment will be selected. The target segment to be monitored will be determined in a non-PCI site (>5 mm proximal or distal to the PCI site) on the PCI or non-PCI vessel with a reproducible fiduciary index such as side branches, calcifications, or stent edges.

      Endpoints

      Based on an expert consensus document paper [
      • Mintz G.S.
      • Garcia-Garcia H.M.
      • Nicholls S.J.
      • Weissman N.J.
      • Bruining N.
      • Crowe T.
      • Tardif J.C.
      • Serruys P.W.
      Clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound regression/progression studies.
      ], the primary endpoint will be the absolute change in percent coronary atheroma volume from baseline to follow-up. The secondary endpoints will include 1) percent change in atheroma volume, 2) absolute and percent changes in lipid, glycemic, and inflammatory profile [total cholesterol, LDL-C, TG, HDL-C, HDL2-C, HDL3-C, remnant-like lipoprotein particles cholesterol (RLP-C), small dense LDL, oxidized LDL, free-fatty acid, apoA-I, apoB, apoC-II, apoC-III, lipoprotein (a), fasting insulin level, hemoglobin A1c, adiponectin, lathosterol, cholestanol, sitosterol, campesterol, high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP)], 3) correlation between regression of coronary plaque and the lipid, glycemic, and inflammatory markers, 4) major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE; defined as cardiac death, Q or non-Q wave myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization (PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting)], 5) all-cause death, and 6) any adverse incidents including changes in laboratory values. The above-mentioned laboratory measurements will be performed at a central clinical laboratory (SRL, Inc, Tokyo, Japan). LDL-C was measured using a direct LDL-C homogeneous assay.

      Safety monitoring

      Safety will be observed throughout the study, and be evaluated by regular medical examination and laboratory tests at 3, 6, and 9–12 months after enrollment. The Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) will evaluate MACE and any other adverse events.

      Sample size calculation

      The effect of combination of atorvastatin/ezetimibe on coronary atheroma volume reduction, compared with atorvastatin monotherapy, has not been determined. The sample size calculation was thus performed based on the assumption that the effect of atorvastatin/ezetimibe combination therapy on the regression of coronary atheroma volume is not inferior to that of atorvastatin monotherapy, referencing the similar prior study accomplished in Japan, JAPAN-ACS study [
      • Hiro T.
      • Kimura T.
      • Morimoto T.
      • Miyauchi K.
      • Nakagawa Y.
      • Yamagishi M.
      • Ozaki Y.
      • Kimura K.
      • Saito S.
      • Yamaguchi T.
      • Daida H.
      • Matsuzaki M.
      JAPAN-ACS Investigators
      Effect of intensive statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a multicenter randomized trial evaluated by volumetric intravascular ultrasound using pitavastatin versus atorvastatin (JAPAN-ACS [Japan assessment of pitavastatin and atorvastatin in acute coronary syndrome] study).
      ]. The nominal change in percent coronary atheroma volume in patients participating in the JAPAN-ACS study was −6.3 ± 6.1% in an atorvastatin monotherapy group. We assumed that the mean and standard deviation of the nominal change in percent coronary atheroma volume in patients receiving atorvastatin/ezetimibe combination therapy were equal to those with atorvastatin monotherapy reported in the study. Based on the standard deviation in the atorvastatin monotherapy group, we established a non-inferiority margin of 3%, and calculated 100 subjects in each group with an alpha level of 5%, a power of 80%. A key secondary objective was to determine whether atorvastatin/ezetimibe combination was superiority to atorvastatin monotherapy with respect to the nominal change in percent coronary atheroma volume.

      Discussion

      Attainment rate of target LDL-C levels and safety

      The European guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia recommend aggressive lipid-lowering therapy targeting LDL-C <70 mg/dL in patients with CAD [
      • European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention
      • Rehabilitation
      • Reiner Z.
      • Catapano A.L.
      • De Backer G.
      • Graham I.
      • Taskinen M.R.
      • Wiklund O.
      • Agewall S.
      • Alegria E.
      • Chapman M.J.
      • Durrington P.
      • Erdine S.
      • Halcox J.
      • Hobbs R.
      • Kjekshus J.
      • et al.
      ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS).
      ]. On the contrary, according to Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012 [
      • Teramoto T.
      • Sasaki J.
      • Ishibashi S.
      • Birou S.
      • Daida H.
      • Dohi S.
      • Egusa G.
      • Hiro T.
      • Hirobe K.
      • Iida M.
      • Kihara S.
      • Kinoshita M.
      • Maruyama C.
      • Ohta T.
      • Okamura T.
      • et al.
      Executive summary of the Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) guidelines for the diagnosis and prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases in Japan -2012 version.
      ], the target LDL-C level for secondary prevention of atherosclerosis is currently <100 mg/dL. Despite the looser setting of target level of LDL-C, the attainment rate of these target LDL-C levels in patients treated with statins was less than 25% [
      • Teramoto T.
      • Kashiwagi A.
      • Ishibashi S.
      • Daida H.
      Japan Lipid Guideline Achievement Program Investigators
      Cross-sectional survey to assess the status of lipid management in high-risk patients with dyslipidemia: clinical impact of combination therapy with ezetimibe.
      ]. However, several studies demonstrated that statin/ezetimibe combination therapy (especially with strong statins) could help attain the guideline-recommended strict LDL-C goals [
      • Sharma M.
      • Ansari M.T.
      • Abou-Setta A.M.
      • Soares-Weiser K.
      • Ooi T.C.
      • Sears M.
      • Yazdi F.
      • Tsertsvadze A.
      • Moher D.
      Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and harms of combination therapy and monotherapy for dyslipidemia.
      ]. Given these findings, the treatment strategies [atorvastatin/ezetimibe or atorvastatin monotherapy (dose titration)] planned in the PRECISE-IVUS trial will be expected to attain the LDL-C target levels of <70 mg/dL.

      Difference in likelihood of plaque regression between ACS and stable angina

      A significant regression in the coronary atheroma volume has been reported in previous studies using statins and other agents. Previous studies have suggested that statin-induced regression in coronary atherosclerosis appeared to be more prominent in patients with ACS [−13.1% to −18.1% in median percentage of change in total atheroma volume (TAV)] [
      • Hiro T.
      • Kimura T.
      • Morimoto T.
      • Miyauchi K.
      • Nakagawa Y.
      • Yamagishi M.
      • Ozaki Y.
      • Kimura K.
      • Saito S.
      • Yamaguchi T.
      • Daida H.
      • Matsuzaki M.
      JAPAN-ACS Investigators
      Effect of intensive statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a multicenter randomized trial evaluated by volumetric intravascular ultrasound using pitavastatin versus atorvastatin (JAPAN-ACS [Japan assessment of pitavastatin and atorvastatin in acute coronary syndrome] study).
      ,
      • Okazaki S.
      • Yokoyama T.
      • Miyauchi K.
      • Shimada K.
      • Kurata T.
      • Sato H.
      • Daida H.
      Early statin treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome: demonstration of the beneficial effect on atherosclerotic lesions by serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis during half a year after coronary event: the ESTABLISH Study.
      ] than in patients with stable coronary artery disease (−0.4% to −6.8% in median percentage of change in TAV) [
      • Nissen S.E.
      • Nicholls S.J.
      • Sipahi I.
      • Libby P.
      • Raichlen J.S.
      • Ballantyne C.M.
      • Davignon J.
      • Erbel R.
      • Fruchart J.C.
      • Tardif J.C.
      • Schoenhagen P.
      • Crowe T.
      • Cain V.
      • Wolski K.
      • Goormastic M.
      • et al.
      Effect of very high-intensity statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis: the ASTEROID trial.
      ,
      • Nissen S.E.
      • Tuzcu E.M.
      • Schoenhagen P.
      • Brown B.G.
      • Ganz P.
      • Vogel R.A.
      • Crowe T.
      • Howard G.
      • Cooper C.J.
      • Brodie B.
      • Grines C.L.
      • DeMaria A.N.
      REVERSAL Investigators
      Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.
      ]. Therefore, an association between the coronary plaque regression induced by statin therapy and patients’ clinical presentation, such as stable coronary artery disease or unstable status, has been speculated. However, little has been studied regarding this association in a randomized study design prospectively. The PRECISE-IVUS trial will clarify this in a current clinical setting.

      Clinical implication of the PRECISE-IVUS trial

      Although a variety of factors could potentially influence the treatment effect of ezetimibe in the PRECISE-IVUS trial, a positive result will support the concept that combination of ezetimibe/statin could be an effective treatment especially for high-risk patients (e.g. individuals with high baseline LDL-C values, patients with diabetes, patients with established cardiovascular disease, and individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia). A positive result will also provide evidence supporting the concept that ezetimibe can be effective in patients who are unable to tolerate high-dose statins, those who may better tolerate a combination of low-dose statin plus ezetimibe, and those who do not achieve adequate LDL-C lowering despite high-dose statin use.
      Given the combination effect of statin/ezetimibe previously demonstrated in the existing studies, whereas combined therapy with ezetimibe/simvastatin failed to show a significant difference in changes in intima-media thickness, as compared with simvastatin alone, in the Ezetimibe and Simvastatin in Hypercholesterolemia Enhances Atherosclerosis Regression (ENHANCE) trial [
      • Kastelein J.J.
      • Akdim F.
      • Stroes E.S.
      • Zwinderman A.H.
      • Bots M.L.
      • Stalenhoef A.F.
      • Visseren F.L.
      • Sijbrands E.J.
      • Trip M.D.
      • Stein E.A.
      • Gaudet D.
      • Duivenvoorden R.
      • Veltri E.P.
      • Marais A.D.
      • de Groot E.
      • et al.
      Simvastatin with or without ezetimibe in familial hypercholesterolemia.
      ], the SHARP (Study of Heart and Renal Protection) trial provided evidence for safe and effective lowering of LDL-C with a combination of ezetimibe/simvastatin among a wide range of patients with chronic kidney disease [
      • Baigent C.
      • Landray M.J.
      • Reith C.
      • Emberson J.
      • Wheeler D.C.
      • Tomson C.
      • Wanner C.
      • Krane V.
      • Cass A.
      • Craig J.
      • Neal B.
      • Jiang L.
      • Hooi L.S.
      • Levin A.
      • Agodoa L.
      • et al.
      The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with chronic kidney disease (Study of Heart and Renal Protection): a randomised placebo-controlled trial.
      ]. Furthermore, in the SEAS (Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis) trial conducted among patients with aortic stenosis, although there were no differences in preventive effect on major cardiovascular diseases, combination therapy was significantly superior to placebo in terms of preventive effect on ischemic heart disease [
      • Rossebo A.B.
      • Pedersen T.R.
      • Boman K.
      • Brudi P.
      • Chambers J.B.
      • Egstrup K.
      • Gerdts E.
      • Gohlke-Barwolf C.
      • Holme I.
      • Kesaniemi Y.A.
      • Malbecq W.
      • Nienaber C.A.
      • Ray S.
      • Skjaerpe T.
      • Wachtell K.
      • et al.
      Intensive lipid lowering with simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis.
      ]. Our IVUS findings from the PRECISE-IVUS trial would thus provide additional findings regarding possible underlying mechanisms of the above-mentioned beneficial effects of combination therapy on CV outcomes.

      New cholesterol treatment guideline released by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association

      The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Task Force on Practice Guidelines has recently released the new cholesterol treatment guideline [
      • Stone N.J.
      • Robinson J.G.
      • Lichtenstein A.H.
      • Bairey Merz C.N.
      • Blum C.B.
      • Eckel R.H.
      • Goldberg A.C.
      • Gordon D.
      • Levy D.
      • Lloyd-Jones D.M.
      • McBride P.
      • Schwartz J.S.
      • Shero S.T.
      • Smith Jr., S.C.
      • Watson K.
      • et al.
      2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.
      ]. The new cholesterol treatment guideline emphasizes matching the intensity of statin treatment to the level of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk (“fire and forget” concept) and replaces the old paradigm of pursuing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets (“treat to target” concept). First of all, extrapolating the ACC/AHA recommendation into the current Japanese clinical setting, high-intensity therapy (≥50% LDL-C reduction), namely atorvastatin of 40–80 mg daily or rosuvastatin of 20–40 mg daily, has not been approved in the Japanese healthcare services provided by health insurance. Furthermore, the new guideline does not recommend treatment to reach a particular LDL-C, because the panel did not find any evidence of treating to a target. On the other hand, however, Boekholdt et al. showed that patients who achieve very low LDL-C levels have a lower risk for major cardiovascular events than do those achieving moderately low levels, supporting the concept of “the lower, the better” [
      • Boekholdt S.M.
      • Hovingh G.K.
      • Mora S.
      • Arsenault B.J.
      • Amarenco P.
      • Pedersen T.R.
      • LaRosa J.C.
      • Waters D.D.
      • DeMicco D.A.
      • Simes R.J.
      • Keech A.C.
      • Colquhoun D.
      • Hitman G.A.
      • Betteridge D.J.
      • Clearfield M.B.
      • et al.
      Very low levels of atherogenic lipoproteins and the risk for cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis of statin trials.
      ]. In addition, Nicholls et al. demonstrated that a direct relationship was observed between the burden of coronary atherosclerosis, its progression, and adverse cardiovascular events [
      • Nicholls S.J.
      • Hsu A.
      • Wolski K.
      • Hu B.
      • Bayturan O.
      • Lavoie A.
      • Uno K.
      • Tuzcu E.M.
      • Nissen S.E.
      Intravascular ultrasound-derived measures of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden and clinical outcome.
      ]. These data support the use of atherosclerosis imaging with IVUS in the evaluation of novel antiatherosclerotic therapies. A positive result of the PRECISE-IVUS trial could also lead to an early re-evaluation of the new ACC/AHA lipid management guidelines that endorse statins as the only recommended drugs for treating cholesterol-related CV risk.

      Conclusion

      PRECISE-IVUS will assess whether the efficacy of combination of ezetimibe/atorvastatin is noninferior to atorvastatin monotherapy for coronary plaque reduction, and will give us new insights into real-world information about lipid-lowering and suppression of coronary atheroma progression in Japan.

      Disclosures

      Hisao Ogawa has received remuneration for lectures from Bayer, Boehringer lngelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Pfizer, and Takeda, and has received trust research/joint research funds from Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, and Novartis, and has also received scholarship funds from AstraZeneca, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Kowa, MSD, Otsuka, Pfizer, Sanofi, Shionogi, and Takeda. Masaharu Ishihara has received remuneration for lectures from MSD. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

      Acknowledgments

      The authors thank Mses Akiyo Kikuchi and Yuko Kuratsu for their secretarial assistance, and also thank Michiyo Saito (MT) for her technical assistance in angiographic and intravascular ultrasound data acquisition and measurement.

      Appendix A.

      Study organization
      • Principal investigator:
      • Hisao Ogawa, Kumamoto University
      • Steering committee:
      • Seigo Sugiyama, Jinnouchi Hospital
      • Hitoshi Sumida, Kumamoto Central Hospital
      • Kenichi Tsujita, Kumamoto University
      • Core laboratory:
      • Kenichi Tsujita, Kumamoto University
      • Study statistician:
      • Kunihiko Matsui, Yamaguchi University Hospital
      • Data and safety monitoring committee:
      • Kazuo Kimura, Yokohama City University Medical Center
      • Satoshi Yasuda, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
      Participating hospitals and collaborators of PRECISE-IVUS trial.
      • 1.
        Fukuoka Tokushukai Medical Center: H Shimomura, Y Yamada, Y Nakamura, T Kudo, S Morisaki, Y Ogura, T Nagata, N Chazono, K Yamanaga, Y Onoue, Y Matsumuro
      • 2.
        Kumamoto University Hospital: H Ogawa, S Hokimoto, K Kaikita, S Tayama, K Tsujita, K Sakamoto, E Akiyama, N Komura, K Yamanaga, T Ono
      • 3.
        Social Insurance Omuta Tenryo Hospital: K Matsuyama, T Yamashita, M Miura, T Chitose
      • 4.
        New Tokyo Hospital: S Nakamura, S Mitomo
      • 5.
        Shin-Beppu Hospital: N Nakamura, K Kikuta, K Watanabe, T Miyazaki
      • 6.
        Kumamoto City Hospital: Y Morikami, Y Miyazaki, M Fukuda, H Nako
      • 7.
        Japan Labor Health and Welfare Organization Kumamoto Rosai Hospital: T Matsuura, H Doi, K Abe, N Tabata
      • 8.
        Health Insurance Hitoyoshi General Hospital: H Oka, S Nakamura
      • 9.
        Amakusa Medical Center: N Sakaino, S Nakamura, T Nozaki
      • 10.
        Arao City Hospital: I Kajiwara, Enomoto K, D Sueta
      • 11.
        Hiroshima City Hospital: M Ishihara, I Inoue, K Ohi
      • 12.
        Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital: K Nakao, T Sakamoto, S Miyamoto, E Taguchi, T Fukunaga, T Tokitsu, S Ogawa
      • 13.
        Miyazaki Prefectural Nobeoka Hospital: N Yamamoto, K Kurogi, R Fukushima
      • 14.
        Social Insurance Kumamoto General Hospital: S Koide, T Uemura
      • 15.
        Kumamoto Central Hospital: S Oshima, K Noda, H Sumida, T Nishijima, K Morihisa
      • 16.
        National Hospital Organization Kumamoto Medical Center: K Fujimoto, Y Miyao, H Koga, T Honda, M Matsukawa, J Matsubara
      • 17.
        Japanese Red Cross Kumamoto Hospital: R Tsunoda, T Ito, H Yoshimura, S Fuchigami

      References

        • Lozano R.
        • Naghavi M.
        • Foreman K.
        • Lim S.
        • Shibuya K.
        • Aboyans V.
        • Abraham J.
        • Adair T.
        • Aggarwal R.
        • Ahn S.Y.
        • Alvarado M.
        • Anderson H.R.
        • Anderson L.M.
        • Andrews K.G.
        • Atkinson C.
        • et al.
        Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.
        Lancet. 2012; 380: 2095-2128
        • Imamura T.
        • Doi Y.
        • Arima H.
        • Yonemoto K.
        • Hata J.
        • Kubo M.
        • Tanizaki Y.
        • Ibayashi S.
        • Iida M.
        • Kiyohara Y.
        LDL cholesterol and the development of stroke subtypes and coronary heart disease in a general Japanese population: the Hisayama study.
        Stroke. 2009; 40: 382-388
        • Baigent C.
        • Keech A.
        • Kearney P.M.
        • Blackwell L.
        • Buck G.
        • Pollicino C.
        • Kirby A.
        • Sourjina T.
        • Peto R.
        • Collins R.
        • Simes R.
        • Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators
        Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins.
        Lancet. 2005; 366: 1267-1278
        • Grundy S.M.
        • Cleeman J.I.
        • Merz C.N.
        • Brewer Jr., H.B.
        • Clark L.T.
        • Hunninghake D.B.
        • Pasternak R.C.
        • Smith Jr., S.C.
        • Stone N.J.
        National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association. Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines.
        Circulation. 2004; 110: 227-239
        • Pearson T.A.
        • Denke M.A.
        • McBride P.E.
        • Battisti W.P.
        • Brady W.E.
        • Palmisano J.
        A community-based, randomized trial of ezetimibe added to statin therapy to attain NCEP ATP III goals for LDL cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic patients: the ezetimibe add-on to statin for effectiveness (EASE) trial.
        Mayo Clin Proc. 2005; 80: 587-595
        • Bays H.E.
        • Ose L.
        • Fraser N.
        • Tribble D.L.
        • Quinto K.
        • Reyes R.
        • Johnson-Levonas A.O.
        • Sapre A.
        • Donahue S.R.
        • Ezetimibe Study Group
        A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, factorial design study to evaluate the lipid-altering efficacy and safety profile of the ezetimibe/simvastatin tablet compared with ezetimibe and simvastatin monotherapy in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.
        Clin Ther. 2004; 26: 1758-1773
        • Ballantyne C.M.
        • Abate N.
        • Yuan Z.
        • King T.R.
        • Palmisano J.
        Dose-comparison study of the combination of ezetimibe and simvastatin (Vytorin) versus atorvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia: the Vytorin Versus Atorvastatin (VYVA) study.
        Am Heart J. 2005; 149: 464-473
        • Cannon C.P.
        • Giugliano R.P.
        • Blazing M.A.
        • Harrington R.A.
        • Peterson J.L.
        • Sisk C.M.
        • Strony J.
        • Musliner T.A.
        • McCabe C.H.
        • Veltri E.
        • Braunwald E.
        • Califf R.M.
        IMPROVE-IT Investigators Rationale and design of IMPROVE-IT (IMProved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial): comparison of ezetimbe/simvastatin versus simvastatin monotherapy on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes.
        Am Heart J. 2008; 156: 826-832
        • Hiro T.
        • Hirayama A.
        • Ueda Y.
        • Komatsu S.
        • Matsuoka H.
        • Takayama T.
        • Ishihara M.
        • Hayashi T.
        • Saito S.
        • Kodama K.
        • ZIPANGU Investigators
        Rationale and design of a randomized clinical study to investigate the effect of ezetimibe, a cholesterol absorption inhibitor, on the regression of intracoronary plaque evaluated by non-obstructive angioscopy and ultrasound: The ZIPANGU study.
        J Cardiol. 2014; 64: 501-507
        • Pocock S.J.
        • Simon R.
        Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial.
        Biometrics. 1975; 31: 103-115
        • Brunzell J.D.
        • Davidson M.
        • Furberg C.D.
        • Goldberg R.B.
        • Howard B.V.
        • Stein J.H.
        • Witztum J.L.
        Lipoprotein management in patients with cardiometabolic risk: consensus conference report from the American Diabetes Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 51: 1512-1524
        • Mintz G.S.
        • Garcia-Garcia H.M.
        • Nicholls S.J.
        • Weissman N.J.
        • Bruining N.
        • Crowe T.
        • Tardif J.C.
        • Serruys P.W.
        Clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound regression/progression studies.
        EuroIntervention. 2011; 6 (9): 1123-1130
        • Hiro T.
        • Kimura T.
        • Morimoto T.
        • Miyauchi K.
        • Nakagawa Y.
        • Yamagishi M.
        • Ozaki Y.
        • Kimura K.
        • Saito S.
        • Yamaguchi T.
        • Daida H.
        • Matsuzaki M.
        • JAPAN-ACS Investigators
        Effect of intensive statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a multicenter randomized trial evaluated by volumetric intravascular ultrasound using pitavastatin versus atorvastatin (JAPAN-ACS [Japan assessment of pitavastatin and atorvastatin in acute coronary syndrome] study).
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 54: 293-302
        • European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention
        • Rehabilitation
        • Reiner Z.
        • Catapano A.L.
        • De Backer G.
        • Graham I.
        • Taskinen M.R.
        • Wiklund O.
        • Agewall S.
        • Alegria E.
        • Chapman M.J.
        • Durrington P.
        • Erdine S.
        • Halcox J.
        • Hobbs R.
        • Kjekshus J.
        • et al.
        ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS).
        Eur Heart J. 2011; 32: 1769-1818
        • Teramoto T.
        • Sasaki J.
        • Ishibashi S.
        • Birou S.
        • Daida H.
        • Dohi S.
        • Egusa G.
        • Hiro T.
        • Hirobe K.
        • Iida M.
        • Kihara S.
        • Kinoshita M.
        • Maruyama C.
        • Ohta T.
        • Okamura T.
        • et al.
        Executive summary of the Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) guidelines for the diagnosis and prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases in Japan -2012 version.
        J Atheroscler Thromb. 2013; 20: 517-523
        • Teramoto T.
        • Kashiwagi A.
        • Ishibashi S.
        • Daida H.
        • Japan Lipid Guideline Achievement Program Investigators
        Cross-sectional survey to assess the status of lipid management in high-risk patients with dyslipidemia: clinical impact of combination therapy with ezetimibe.
        Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2012; 73: 1-15
        • Sharma M.
        • Ansari M.T.
        • Abou-Setta A.M.
        • Soares-Weiser K.
        • Ooi T.C.
        • Sears M.
        • Yazdi F.
        • Tsertsvadze A.
        • Moher D.
        Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and harms of combination therapy and monotherapy for dyslipidemia.
        Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151: 622-630
        • Okazaki S.
        • Yokoyama T.
        • Miyauchi K.
        • Shimada K.
        • Kurata T.
        • Sato H.
        • Daida H.
        Early statin treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome: demonstration of the beneficial effect on atherosclerotic lesions by serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis during half a year after coronary event: the ESTABLISH Study.
        Circulation. 2004; 110: 1061-1068
        • Nissen S.E.
        • Nicholls S.J.
        • Sipahi I.
        • Libby P.
        • Raichlen J.S.
        • Ballantyne C.M.
        • Davignon J.
        • Erbel R.
        • Fruchart J.C.
        • Tardif J.C.
        • Schoenhagen P.
        • Crowe T.
        • Cain V.
        • Wolski K.
        • Goormastic M.
        • et al.
        Effect of very high-intensity statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis: the ASTEROID trial.
        JAMA. 2006; 295: 1556-1565
        • Nissen S.E.
        • Tuzcu E.M.
        • Schoenhagen P.
        • Brown B.G.
        • Ganz P.
        • Vogel R.A.
        • Crowe T.
        • Howard G.
        • Cooper C.J.
        • Brodie B.
        • Grines C.L.
        • DeMaria A.N.
        • REVERSAL Investigators
        Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.
        JAMA. 2004; 291: 1071-1080
        • Kastelein J.J.
        • Akdim F.
        • Stroes E.S.
        • Zwinderman A.H.
        • Bots M.L.
        • Stalenhoef A.F.
        • Visseren F.L.
        • Sijbrands E.J.
        • Trip M.D.
        • Stein E.A.
        • Gaudet D.
        • Duivenvoorden R.
        • Veltri E.P.
        • Marais A.D.
        • de Groot E.
        • et al.
        Simvastatin with or without ezetimibe in familial hypercholesterolemia.
        N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 1431-1443
        • Baigent C.
        • Landray M.J.
        • Reith C.
        • Emberson J.
        • Wheeler D.C.
        • Tomson C.
        • Wanner C.
        • Krane V.
        • Cass A.
        • Craig J.
        • Neal B.
        • Jiang L.
        • Hooi L.S.
        • Levin A.
        • Agodoa L.
        • et al.
        The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with chronic kidney disease (Study of Heart and Renal Protection): a randomised placebo-controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2011; 377: 2181-2192
        • Rossebo A.B.
        • Pedersen T.R.
        • Boman K.
        • Brudi P.
        • Chambers J.B.
        • Egstrup K.
        • Gerdts E.
        • Gohlke-Barwolf C.
        • Holme I.
        • Kesaniemi Y.A.
        • Malbecq W.
        • Nienaber C.A.
        • Ray S.
        • Skjaerpe T.
        • Wachtell K.
        • et al.
        Intensive lipid lowering with simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis.
        N Engl J Med. 2008; 359: 1343-1356
        • Stone N.J.
        • Robinson J.G.
        • Lichtenstein A.H.
        • Bairey Merz C.N.
        • Blum C.B.
        • Eckel R.H.
        • Goldberg A.C.
        • Gordon D.
        • Levy D.
        • Lloyd-Jones D.M.
        • McBride P.
        • Schwartz J.S.
        • Shero S.T.
        • Smith Jr., S.C.
        • Watson K.
        • et al.
        2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.
        Circulation. 2014; 129: S1-S45
        • Boekholdt S.M.
        • Hovingh G.K.
        • Mora S.
        • Arsenault B.J.
        • Amarenco P.
        • Pedersen T.R.
        • LaRosa J.C.
        • Waters D.D.
        • DeMicco D.A.
        • Simes R.J.
        • Keech A.C.
        • Colquhoun D.
        • Hitman G.A.
        • Betteridge D.J.
        • Clearfield M.B.
        • et al.
        Very low levels of atherogenic lipoproteins and the risk for cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis of statin trials.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64: 485-494
        • Nicholls S.J.
        • Hsu A.
        • Wolski K.
        • Hu B.
        • Bayturan O.
        • Lavoie A.
        • Uno K.
        • Tuzcu E.M.
        • Nissen S.E.
        Intravascular ultrasound-derived measures of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden and clinical outcome.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55: 2399-2407